Select and compare
Rokid AR Spatial vs. XREAL One Pro compared
Video Glasses
At a glance
The key numbers for both devices side by side.
Overall rating
9090Sehr gut
8888Gut
Value for money
76Fair
78Fair
Best price
€159.00
€599.00
Price advantage
€440.00 cheaper
—
Offers
2 shops
2 shops
Rank in category
Rank 1 of 10
Rank 2 of 10
Rating
Sub-ratings compared
Rokid AR SpatialOverall rating 90XREAL One ProOverall rating 88
Rokid AR SpatialXREAL One Pro
Image quality96/10093/100
Image size & edge sharpness91/10085/100
Wearing comfort85/10085/100
Compatibility & setup85/10086/100
Features93/10084/100
Sound87/10078/100
Build quality93/10084/100
Image quality
96
93
Image size & edge sharpness
91
85
Wearing comfort
85
85
Compatibility & setup
85
86
Features
93
84
Sound
87
78
Build quality
93
84
Specs
Specs compared
Key specs
Model
AR Spatial
One Pro
Field of viewDiagonal field of view (FOV) according to the manufacturer in degrees – the comparable value for image size, unlike the inch figure
50 degrees
57 degrees
TrackingHighest level at which the glasses anchor the image in space: 3DoF follows head rotation, 6DoF also movement through the room; “in the glasses” means with a built-in chip on any source device, without an app
3DoF only with app or accessory
6DoF with accessory
BrightnessBrightness according to the manufacturer in nits (= cd/m²): the value at the eye (“perceived”), NOT that of the display itself (often 3,000 to 6,000 nits); if the manufacturer gives only one value without qualification, use that
600 cd/m²
700 cd/m²
WeightWeight of the glasses according to the manufacturer in grams, without cable, shade and prescription frame
75 g (2.6 oz)
87 g (3.1 oz)
For glasses wearersHow short-sighted users see sharply without their own glasses: insert frame for prescription lenses from an optician or adjustment wheels on the glasses themselves; choose the best available solution
Built-in diopter adjustment
Prescription frame (lenses from an optician)
Image & optics
OpticsType of optics that directs the image into the eye, according to the manufacturer: birdbath (semi-transparent mirror, usually thicker lenses) or flat prism (e.g. XREAL X-Prism)
Flat prism
Display technologyType of image source in the glasses according to the manufacturer (usually Micro-OLED from Sony or BOE)
Micro-OLED
Micro-OLED
Resolution per eyeDisplay resolution for ONE eye according to the manufacturer, not the sum of both eyes; if the manufacturer only delivers the higher resolution via an update, the advertised one
WUXGA (1920 × 1200)
Full HD (1920 × 1080)
Refresh rateHighest refresh rate according to the manufacturer in Hz
120 Hz
120 Hz
HDR formatsHDR formats the glasses themselves display according to the manufacturer – even if this requires a source device from the manufacturer
No HDR
3D (side-by-side)According to the manufacturer, the glasses display 3D content in side-by-side format, one image per eye
Yes
Yes
Screen modesDisplay modes the glasses support themselves or with the manufacturer’s app, according to the manufacturer
Ultrawide (32:9)Multiple screensAnchor image in space
Ultrawide (32:9)Anchor image in spaceSmall image at the edge2D-to-3D conversion
Dimming
DimmingHow the surroundings behind the image can be blocked out: clip-on shade or electrically dimming lenses; choose the best available solution
Clip-on shade
Electrochromic (at the push of a button)
Dimming levelsNumber of electric dimming levels according to the manufacturer, including “clear”; only for electrochromic lenses
3 levels
Vision & fit
Correction up toStrongest short-sightedness the built-in adjustment corrects, as an absolute value in diopters: “0 to −6.0 dpt” becomes 6; only with built-in adjustment, none corrects astigmatism
6 dpt
0 dpt
Interpupillary distance adjustmentHow the glasses are adapted to the distance between the pupils: separate versions per size (S/M/L), image shifting via software or movable optics
Via software
Fixed sizes per versionVia software
Interpupillary distance (IPD)Suitable interpupillary distance according to the manufacturer in mm, e.g. “57–66 mm” or “under 64 mm” – for sizes S/M/L, enter per version
55–72 mm
M: 57–66 mm, L: 66–75 mm
Connection & features
Video inputHow the image gets into the glasses: USB-C with DisplayPort signal, HDMI only via a manufacturer adapter, or wirelessly
USB-C (DisplayPort)Wireless
USB-C (DisplayPort)
Detachable cableAccording to the manufacturer, the cable can be unplugged from the glasses and replaced
Yes
CameraAccording to the manufacturer, a camera is built into the glasses (photos, spatial recognition); a camera available only as an accessory does not count
No
MicrophonesNumber of built-in microphones according to the manufacturer
1 pcs
0 pcs
Speaker tuningAudio partner according to the manufacturer, e.g. “Bang & Olufsen”, “Bose” or “Harman”; empty if none is named
Bose
General
Warranty
1 years
Price segment
Premium
Model year
2025
2025
In the box
Max 2 Brille, Station 2 mit Silikonhülle, Etui, USB-C-Kabel, Aufsteck-Blende, Ersatz-Nasenpads
Brille, Korrekturrahmen, USB-C-Kabel, Nasenpads (S/M/L), Reinigungstuch, Schutzetui, Bedienungsanleitung
Prices
Offers
Verdict
Pros & cons
Die Rokid AR Spatial verbindet die Videobrille Max 2 mit der Station 2 zu einem Reisekino, das kein Smartphone braucht. Das Micro-OLED-Bild ist scharf und kontrastreich, 75 g sind leicht, und Streaming-Apps laufen direkt über den Play Store. Der Haken: Der Lüfter der Station ist gut hörbar, die Bügel drücken nach einer Weile, und eine deutsche Oberfläche fehlt bisher.
Pros
- Scharfes Micro-OLED-Bild mit 1920 x 1080 Pixeln je Auge und sattem Kontrast
- Station 2 mit Play Store spielt Streaming-Apps ohne Smartphone ab
- Mit 75 g leicht, Ersatz-Nasenpads liegen bei
- Dioptrienrädchen je Auge gleichen Kurzsichtigkeit bis −6 dpt aus
- Bis zu drei Fenster gleichzeitig, Maus und Tastatur per Bluetooth
- Brille läuft auch allein an Laptop oder Handy mit USB-C-Bildausgang
Cons
- Lüfter der Station 2 im ruhigen Zimmer gut hörbar, auch beim Streamen
- Bügel drücken nach längerer Zeit hinter den Ohren
- Keine deutsche Oberfläche, Region nur China, Japan oder USA
- Rokid-App fürs Smartphone stürzt wiederholt ab
- Station bei drei offenen Apps an der Leistungsgrenze, Netflix nicht im Split-Screen
Die XREAL One Pro ist eine Videobrille am Kabel mit 57° Sichtfeld fast ohne Spiegelungen und kräftigem Micro-OLED-Bild bei 120 Hz. Für Filme und Handheld-Spiele unterwegs oder im Bett taugt sie sehr gut, der X1-Chip hält das Bild ohne App fest. Der Haken: Text an den Rändern wird weich, der Anker driftet gelegentlich, und nur die passende Größe M oder L zeigt scharf – miss deinen Augenabstand vorher.
Pros
- 57° Sichtfeld mit Flachprisma, Spiegelungen von Kleidung und Lampen fallen weitgehend weg
- 700 cd/m² am Auge, echtes Schwarz und 120 Hz für flüssige Handheld-Spiele
- X1-Chip fixiert das Bild per 3DoF ohne App an jedem USB-C-Zuspieler
- Mit 87 g leicht genug für einen ganzen Film, auch liegend im Bett
- Abnehmbares Kabel lässt sich gegen ein USB-C-Videokabel tauschen
- Korrekturrahmen liegt bei, Gläser vom Optiker gleichen auch Hornhautverkrümmung aus
Cons
- Ränder und Ecken werden weich, kleine Schrift und Taskleiste schwer lesbar
- Bildanker driftet gelegentlich und muss per Taste neu zentriert werden
- Brille wird über den Augen warm, bei manchen Kopfschmerzen nach ein, zwei Stunden
- Ultrawide unter Windows mit ständigem Neuinitialisieren, auf manchen Android-Handys gar nicht verfügbar
- Offene Bügellautsprecher ohne tiefen Bass, kein Mikrofon
Spotted an error?
Wrong price, wrong spec or a dead link – let us know and we will fix it quickly.
Similar comparisons
Rokid AR Spatial90
VITURE Beast86Rokid AR Spatial90
XREAL 1S82Rokid AR Spatial90
RayNeo GT Max81Rokid AR Spatial90
XREAL 1 Pro+81Keep reading
What’s next?
Maybe a different type of device?
Same kind of training, different devices – one click away.
Build your own comparison