The Best Video Glasses of 2026 – 10 models rated & ranked

Video Glasses compared: 10 models, rated on our own experience, expert tests, specs and owner feedback.

Top pickRokid AR Spatial
Best valueXREAL One Profrom €599

TWBy Tobias WendtTV, audio & photo editor

UpdatedNovember 2, 2026

Ranking

10models rated

View the ranking

Head-to-head

Tap a hexagon and pick a model

Pick two models10 ready-made duels

Our recommendations

The Video Glasses we recommend

No. 1 · Top pick

Rokid AR Spatial

At a glance

Field of view: 50 degrees
Tracking: 3DoF only with app or accessory
Brightness: 600 cd/m²
Weight: 75 g (2.6 oz)

Our verdictExcellent90

Die Rokid AR Spatial verbindet die Videobrille Max 2 mit der Station 2 zu einem Reisekino, das kein Smartphone braucht.

Pros

Scharfes Micro-OLED-Bild mit 1920 x 1080 Pixeln je Auge und sattem Kontrast
Station 2 mit Play Store spielt Streaming-Apps ohne Smartphone ab
Mit 75 g leicht, Ersatz-Nasenpads liegen bei

Cons

Lüfter der Station 2 im ruhigen Zimmer gut hörbar, auch beim Streamen
Bügel drücken nach längerer Zeit hinter den Ohren
Keine deutsche Oberfläche, Region nur China, Japan oder USA

Best for

Pendler, die im Zug Serien ohne angestecktes Handy schauen wollen
Besitzer von Handys ohne Bildausgabe über USB-C
Cloud-Gamer mit GeForce Now oder Remote Play unterwegs

How we rated it7 criteria

OverallOur rating 90 · ExcellentValue for money 76 · Fair

How the meta score is made

Our editorial rating50 %
Independent test reports35 %
Ratings from our readers15 %

If a part is missing, its weight is spread across the others. Value for money does not count towards the meta score.

We rate each criterion from 0 to 100. The editorial rating is their weighted average – the higher the weight, the more a criterion counts.

Image quality
Weight 25 %
What we rate
Sharpness in the centre of the image, contrast and black level, colour accuracy, brightness in daylight, reflections and light leaks at the edge of the lenses
This model
96/ 100Excellent
Image size & edge sharpness
Weight 15 %
What we rate
How large the image appears, whether it stays sharp into the corners and whether you can take it all in without straining your eyes
This model
91/ 100Excellent
Wearing comfort
Weight 20 %
What we rate
Weight and its distribution on nose and ears, nose pads and fit on different head shapes, heat during longer use, solution for glasses wearers
This model
85/ 100Excellent
Compatibility & setup
Weight 15 %
What we rate
Works straight away with smartphone, laptop, console and handheld; required adapters and apps, charging the source device during use, setup without an account
This model
85/ 100Excellent
Features
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Anchoring the image in space without drift, ultrawide and multiple screens, dimming of the surroundings (even, without stripes), 3D, operation via the buttons on the glasses
This model
93/ 100Excellent
Sound
Weight 5 %
What we rate
Volume and sound of the speakers in the temples, how much the people around you can hear, microphone for calls
This model
87/ 100Excellent
Build quality
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Material of frame and hinges, cable and strain relief, protective case, warranty
This model
93/ 100Excellent

How we rate →

No. 2 · Best value

XREAL One Pro

At a glance

Field of view: 57 degrees
Tracking: 6DoF with accessory
Brightness: 700 cd/m²
Weight: 87 g (3.1 oz)

Our verdictExcellent88

Die XREAL One Pro ist eine Videobrille am Kabel mit 57° Sichtfeld fast ohne Spiegelungen und kräftigem Micro-OLED-Bild bei 120 Hz.

Pros

57° Sichtfeld mit Flachprisma, Spiegelungen von Kleidung und Lampen fallen weitgehend weg
700 cd/m² am Auge, echtes Schwarz und 120 Hz für flüssige Handheld-Spiele
X1-Chip fixiert das Bild per 3DoF ohne App an jedem USB-C-Zuspieler

Cons

Ränder und Ecken werden weich, kleine Schrift und Taskleiste schwer lesbar
Bildanker driftet gelegentlich und muss per Taste neu zentriert werden
Brille wird über den Augen warm, bei manchen Kopfschmerzen nach ein, zwei Stunden

Best for

Vielreisende, die Filme schauen oder am Handheld spielen
wer mehrmals pro Woche Filme im Bett oder auf dem Sofa schaut
Umsteiger von älteren XREAL-Brillen, die mehr Sichtfeld wollen

How we rated it7 criteria

OverallOur rating 88 · ExcellentValue for money 78 · Fair

How the meta score is made

Our editorial rating50 %
Independent test reports35 %
Ratings from our readers15 %

If a part is missing, its weight is spread across the others. Value for money does not count towards the meta score.

We rate each criterion from 0 to 100. The editorial rating is their weighted average – the higher the weight, the more a criterion counts.

Image quality
Weight 25 %
What we rate
Sharpness in the centre of the image, contrast and black level, colour accuracy, brightness in daylight, reflections and light leaks at the edge of the lenses
This model
93/ 100Excellent
Image size & edge sharpness
Weight 15 %
What we rate
How large the image appears, whether it stays sharp into the corners and whether you can take it all in without straining your eyes
This model
85/ 100Excellent
Wearing comfort
Weight 20 %
What we rate
Weight and its distribution on nose and ears, nose pads and fit on different head shapes, heat during longer use, solution for glasses wearers
This model
85/ 100Excellent
Compatibility & setup
Weight 15 %
What we rate
Works straight away with smartphone, laptop, console and handheld; required adapters and apps, charging the source device during use, setup without an account
This model
86/ 100Excellent
Features
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Anchoring the image in space without drift, ultrawide and multiple screens, dimming of the surroundings (even, without stripes), 3D, operation via the buttons on the glasses
This model
84/ 100Excellent
Sound
Weight 5 %
What we rate
Volume and sound of the speakers in the temples, how much the people around you can hear, microphone for calls
This model
78/ 100Good
Build quality
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Material of frame and hinges, cable and strain relief, protective case, warranty
This model
84/ 100Excellent

How we rate →

No. 3

VITURE Beast

At a glance

Field of view: 58 degrees
Tracking: 3DoF in the glasses
Brightness: 1,250 cd/m²
Weight: 88 g (3.1 oz)

Our verdictExcellent86

Die VITURE Beast ist eine Videobrille mit 58 Grad Sichtfeld und einem Bild, das selbst in praller Sonne erkennbar bleibt.

Pros

Bis 1250 cd/m² hell, auch im direkten Sonnenlicht gut erkennbar
58 Grad Sichtfeld, Micro-OLED mit 1920 x 1200 je Auge und 120 Hz
3DoF im Chip der Brille, läuft an jedem Zuspieler ohne App

Cons

Ränder weich mit Farbsäumen, kleine Schrift am Bildrand verschwimmt
Abdunklung bildet bei hohen Stufen dunkle Bänder oder Streifen
Elektronik über der Nase wird warm, bei manchen an der Stirn unangenehm heiß

Best for

Spieler mit Steam Deck, ROG Ally oder Legion Go
Vielreisende, die im Zug oder Flugzeug Filme sehen
wer die Brille auch draußen bei hellem Licht nutzt

How we rated it7 criteria

OverallOur rating 86 · ExcellentValue for money 72 · Fair

How the meta score is made

Our editorial rating50 %
Independent test reports35 %
Ratings from our readers15 %

If a part is missing, its weight is spread across the others. Value for money does not count towards the meta score.

We rate each criterion from 0 to 100. The editorial rating is their weighted average – the higher the weight, the more a criterion counts.

Image quality
Weight 25 %
What we rate
Sharpness in the centre of the image, contrast and black level, colour accuracy, brightness in daylight, reflections and light leaks at the edge of the lenses
This model
93/ 100Excellent
Image size & edge sharpness
Weight 15 %
What we rate
How large the image appears, whether it stays sharp into the corners and whether you can take it all in without straining your eyes
This model
76/ 100Good
Wearing comfort
Weight 20 %
What we rate
Weight and its distribution on nose and ears, nose pads and fit on different head shapes, heat during longer use, solution for glasses wearers
This model
83/ 100Excellent
Compatibility & setup
Weight 15 %
What we rate
Works straight away with smartphone, laptop, console and handheld; required adapters and apps, charging the source device during use, setup without an account
This model
87/ 100Excellent
Features
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Anchoring the image in space without drift, ultrawide and multiple screens, dimming of the surroundings (even, without stripes), 3D, operation via the buttons on the glasses
This model
81/ 100Excellent
Sound
Weight 5 %
What we rate
Volume and sound of the speakers in the temples, how much the people around you can hear, microphone for calls
This model
76/ 100Good
Build quality
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Material of frame and hinges, cable and strain relief, protective case, warranty
This model
85/ 100Excellent

How we rate →

No. 4

XREAL 1S

At a glance

Field of view: 52 degrees
Tracking: 6DoF with accessory
Brightness: 700 cd/m²
Weight: 80 g (2.8 oz)

Our verdictExcellent82

Die XREAL 1S ist eine Videobrille für Filme und Handheld-Spiele unterwegs: helles, ruhiges 1200p-Bild, und das Bild bleibt dank X1-Chip ohne App im Raum stehen.

Pros

Helles Micro-OLED-Bild mit 1920 x 1200 Pixeln je Auge und 700 cd/m²
Leinwand bleibt per X1-Chip ohne App und Kamera stabil im Raum
Flüssige Spiele dank 120 Hz

Cons

Ränder und Ecken werden weich, kleiner Text ermüdet bei Büroarbeit
Spiegelungen von Kleidung und Händen bei Tageslicht, keine Blende im Lieferumfang
Sitz hängt stark an der Nasenform, teils Druck oder Kopfschmerzen

Best for

Vielreisende, die in Zug oder Flugzeug Filme schauen
Handheld-Spieler mit Steam Deck, ROG Ally oder ähnlichem USB-C-Gerät
Brillenträger, die einen Korrekturrahmen vom Optiker in Kauf nehmen

How we rated it7 criteria

OverallOur rating 82 · ExcellentValue for money 75 · Fair

How the meta score is made

Our editorial rating50 %
Independent test reports35 %
Ratings from our readers15 %

If a part is missing, its weight is spread across the others. Value for money does not count towards the meta score.

We rate each criterion from 0 to 100. The editorial rating is their weighted average – the higher the weight, the more a criterion counts.

Image quality
Weight 25 %
What we rate
Sharpness in the centre of the image, contrast and black level, colour accuracy, brightness in daylight, reflections and light leaks at the edge of the lenses
This model
80/ 100Excellent
Image size & edge sharpness
Weight 15 %
What we rate
How large the image appears, whether it stays sharp into the corners and whether you can take it all in without straining your eyes
This model
68/ 100Good
Wearing comfort
Weight 20 %
What we rate
Weight and its distribution on nose and ears, nose pads and fit on different head shapes, heat during longer use, solution for glasses wearers
This model
70/ 100Good
Compatibility & setup
Weight 15 %
What we rate
Works straight away with smartphone, laptop, console and handheld; required adapters and apps, charging the source device during use, setup without an account
This model
75/ 100Good
Features
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Anchoring the image in space without drift, ultrawide and multiple screens, dimming of the surroundings (even, without stripes), 3D, operation via the buttons on the glasses
This model
80/ 100Excellent
Sound
Weight 5 %
What we rate
Volume and sound of the speakers in the temples, how much the people around you can hear, microphone for calls
This model
74/ 100Good
Build quality
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Material of frame and hinges, cable and strain relief, protective case, warranty
This model
78/ 100Good

How we rate →

No. 5

RayNeo GT Max

At a glance

Field of view: 59 degrees
Tracking: 3DoF in the glasses
Brightness: 1,200 cd/m²
Weight: 78 g (2.8 oz)

Our verdictExcellent81

Die RayNeo GT Max ist eine leichte Kinobrille mit 59 Grad Sichtfeld: Das Micro-OLED-Bild ist hell und kontrastreich, das eingebaute 3DoF hält die Leinwand ruhig – an jedem Zuspieler, ohne App.

Pros

59 Grad Sichtfeld, breiter als bei vielen Brillen dieser Bauform
Micro-OLED mit tiefem Schwarz, auch bei Tageslicht gut erkennbar
3DoF per Chip in der Brille, drei Modi ohne App an jedem Zuspieler

Cons

Seitliche Bildränder leicht unscharf, Untertitel und Spielanzeigen leiden
Nur 38 Pixel pro Grad, kleine Schrift wirkt grob
Im Pinned-Modus sinkt die Helligkeit auf 336 cd/m²

Best for

Vielreisende, die im Flugzeug oder Zug Filme schauen
Handheld-Spieler mit Steam Deck oder Switch 2 über Dock
Besitzer eines iPhone 15 oder neuer und Oberklasse-Android-Handys

How we rated it7 criteria

OverallOur rating 81 · ExcellentValue for money 62 · Fair

How the meta score is made

Our editorial rating50 %
Independent test reports35 %
Ratings from our readers15 %

If a part is missing, its weight is spread across the others. Value for money does not count towards the meta score.

We rate each criterion from 0 to 100. The editorial rating is their weighted average – the higher the weight, the more a criterion counts.

Image quality
Weight 25 %
What we rate
Sharpness in the centre of the image, contrast and black level, colour accuracy, brightness in daylight, reflections and light leaks at the edge of the lenses
This model
85/ 100Excellent
Image size & edge sharpness
Weight 15 %
What we rate
How large the image appears, whether it stays sharp into the corners and whether you can take it all in without straining your eyes
This model
73/ 100Good
Wearing comfort
Weight 20 %
What we rate
Weight and its distribution on nose and ears, nose pads and fit on different head shapes, heat during longer use, solution for glasses wearers
This model
86/ 100Excellent
Compatibility & setup
Weight 15 %
What we rate
Works straight away with smartphone, laptop, console and handheld; required adapters and apps, charging the source device during use, setup without an account
This model
77/ 100Good
Features
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Anchoring the image in space without drift, ultrawide and multiple screens, dimming of the surroundings (even, without stripes), 3D, operation via the buttons on the glasses
This model
79/ 100Good
Sound
Weight 5 %
What we rate
Volume and sound of the speakers in the temples, how much the people around you can hear, microphone for calls
This model
75/ 100Good
Build quality
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Material of frame and hinges, cable and strain relief, protective case, warranty
This model
81/ 100Excellent

How we rate →

No. 6

XREAL 1 Pro+

At a glance

Field of view: 57 degrees
Tracking: 6DoF with accessory
Brightness: 1,200 cd/m²
Weight: 90 g (3.2 oz)

Our verdictExcellent81

Die XREAL 1 Pro+ ist eine gezielt verbesserte One Pro: 1200 statt 700 Nits am Auge und neue Nasenpads machen sie zur Reisebrille für Zug und Flugzeug.

Pros

Bis zu 1200 Nits am Auge, rund 70 % mehr als die One Pro
Micro-OLED mit 100.000:1 Kontrast, schwarze Balken bleiben schwarz
3DoF über den X1-Chip in der Brille, ohne App am Zuspieler

Cons

Keine sichtbar höhere Bildschärfe als bei der One Pro
1200 Nits nur im Modus Follow ohne Stabilisator und mit AI HDR
6DoF und Gesten nur mit der separat erhältlichen Kamera XREAL Eye

Best for

Vielreisende, die bei Tageslicht im Zug oder Flugzeug schauen
Handheld-Spieler mit Steam Deck oder anderem Gerät mit USB-C-Videoausgang
Neueinsteiger in der Oberklasse mit einem Augenabstand von 57 bis 75 mm

How we rated it7 criteria

OverallOur rating 81 · ExcellentValue for money 58 · Okay

How the meta score is made

Our editorial rating50 %
Independent test reports35 %
Ratings from our readers15 %

If a part is missing, its weight is spread across the others. Value for money does not count towards the meta score.

We rate each criterion from 0 to 100. The editorial rating is their weighted average – the higher the weight, the more a criterion counts.

Image quality
Weight 25 %
What we rate
Sharpness in the centre of the image, contrast and black level, colour accuracy, brightness in daylight, reflections and light leaks at the edge of the lenses
This model
88/ 100Excellent
Image size & edge sharpness
Weight 15 %
What we rate
How large the image appears, whether it stays sharp into the corners and whether you can take it all in without straining your eyes
This model
76/ 100Good
Wearing comfort
Weight 20 %
What we rate
Weight and its distribution on nose and ears, nose pads and fit on different head shapes, heat during longer use, solution for glasses wearers
This model
84/ 100Excellent
Compatibility & setup
Weight 15 %
What we rate
Works straight away with smartphone, laptop, console and handheld; required adapters and apps, charging the source device during use, setup without an account
This model
76/ 100Good
Features
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Anchoring the image in space without drift, ultrawide and multiple screens, dimming of the surroundings (even, without stripes), 3D, operation via the buttons on the glasses
This model
82/ 100Excellent
Sound
Weight 5 %
What we rate
Volume and sound of the speakers in the temples, how much the people around you can hear, microphone for calls
This model
70/ 100Good
Build quality
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Material of frame and hinges, cable and strain relief, protective case, warranty
This model
78/ 100Good

How we rate →

No. 7

RayNeo GT

At a glance

Field of view: 46 degrees
Tracking: 3DoF in the glasses
Brightness: 1,200 cd/m²
Weight: 68 g (2.4 oz)

Our verdictGood78

Die RayNeo GT ist eine leichte Videobrille mit sehr scharfem Micro-OLED-Bild, die das Bild per eingebautem 3DoF-Chip ohne App im Raum hält.

Pros

Sehr scharfes Micro-OLED-Bild mit Full HD je Auge, Text gut lesbar
Eingebauter 3DoF-Chip hält das Bild ohne App, kein Driften dokumentiert
Mit 68 g leicht und über einen ganzen Film bequem

Cons

Keine Abdunklung, Umgebungslicht überstrahlt das Bild bei Tageslicht
Optik fest auf 64 mm Augenabstand, ohne Auswahl an Größen
Dolby Vision nur mit separatem Pocket TV Pro

Best for

Filmschauer drinnen mit Zuspieler mit DisplayPort über USB-C
Laptop-Nutzer, die Text und Dokumente scharf lesen wollen
Steam-Deck-Spieler mit Augenabstand um 64 mm

How we rated it7 criteria

OverallOur rating 78 · GoodValue for money 71 · Fair

How the meta score is made

Our editorial rating50 %
Independent test reports35 %
Ratings from our readers15 %

If a part is missing, its weight is spread across the others. Value for money does not count towards the meta score.

We rate each criterion from 0 to 100. The editorial rating is their weighted average – the higher the weight, the more a criterion counts.

Image quality
Weight 25 %
What we rate
Sharpness in the centre of the image, contrast and black level, colour accuracy, brightness in daylight, reflections and light leaks at the edge of the lenses
This model
83/ 100Excellent
Image size & edge sharpness
Weight 15 %
What we rate
How large the image appears, whether it stays sharp into the corners and whether you can take it all in without straining your eyes
This model
72/ 100Good
Wearing comfort
Weight 20 %
What we rate
Weight and its distribution on nose and ears, nose pads and fit on different head shapes, heat during longer use, solution for glasses wearers
This model
85/ 100Excellent
Compatibility & setup
Weight 15 %
What we rate
Works straight away with smartphone, laptop, console and handheld; required adapters and apps, charging the source device during use, setup without an account
This model
71/ 100Good
Features
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Anchoring the image in space without drift, ultrawide and multiple screens, dimming of the surroundings (even, without stripes), 3D, operation via the buttons on the glasses
This model
73/ 100Good
Sound
Weight 5 %
What we rate
Volume and sound of the speakers in the temples, how much the people around you can hear, microphone for calls
This model
70/ 100Good
Build quality
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Material of frame and hinges, cable and strain relief, protective case, warranty
This model
81/ 100Excellent

How we rate →

No. 8

Rokid Joy 2

At a glance

Field of view: 50 degrees
Tracking: –
Brightness: 600 cd/m²
Weight: 75 g (2.6 oz)

Our verdictGood75

Die Rokid Joy 2 ist ein Set aus der leichten Videobrille Max 2 und einer Android-TV-Station und ein gutes Kino für unterwegs.

Pros

Micro-OLED mit Full HD je Auge und 120 Hz, tiefes Schwarz ohne Pixelraster
75 g leicht, ein ganzer Spielfilm ohne Druckstellen an Nase und Ohren
Station mit Android TV spielt Filme ohne Handy und versorgt die Brille mit Strom

Cons

Bildränder und Buchstabenkanten weicher als die Mitte, schlecht für Textarbeit
Lautsprecher klingen dünn, ohne Bass und sind im Zug zu leise
Keine elektrische Abdunklung, nur eine lose Aufsteckblende

Best for

Vielreisende, die im Zug, Flugzeug oder Hotel Filme schauen
iPhone-Nutzer und Besitzer von Handys ohne Videoausgabe über USB-C
Kurzsichtige bis −6 dpt ohne Hornhautverkrümmung

How we rated it7 criteria

OverallOur rating 75 · GoodValue for money 47 · Okay

How the meta score is made

Our editorial rating50 %
Independent test reports35 %
Ratings from our readers15 %

If a part is missing, its weight is spread across the others. Value for money does not count towards the meta score.

We rate each criterion from 0 to 100. The editorial rating is their weighted average – the higher the weight, the more a criterion counts.

Image quality
Weight 25 %
What we rate
Sharpness in the centre of the image, contrast and black level, colour accuracy, brightness in daylight, reflections and light leaks at the edge of the lenses
This model
82/ 100Excellent
Image size & edge sharpness
Weight 15 %
What we rate
How large the image appears, whether it stays sharp into the corners and whether you can take it all in without straining your eyes
This model
64/ 100Fair
Wearing comfort
Weight 20 %
What we rate
Weight and its distribution on nose and ears, nose pads and fit on different head shapes, heat during longer use, solution for glasses wearers
This model
80/ 100Excellent
Compatibility & setup
Weight 15 %
What we rate
Works straight away with smartphone, laptop, console and handheld; required adapters and apps, charging the source device during use, setup without an account
This model
80/ 100Excellent
Features
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Anchoring the image in space without drift, ultrawide and multiple screens, dimming of the surroundings (even, without stripes), 3D, operation via the buttons on the glasses
This model
62/ 100Fair
Sound
Weight 5 %
What we rate
Volume and sound of the speakers in the temples, how much the people around you can hear, microphone for calls
This model
62/ 100Fair
Build quality
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Material of frame and hinges, cable and strain relief, protective case, warranty
This model
78/ 100Good

How we rate →

No. 9

VITURE Pro 2

At a glance

Field of view: 50 degrees
Tracking: 3DoF only with app or accessory
Brightness: 1,600 cd/m²
Weight: 63 g (2.2 oz)

Our verdictGood74

Die VITURE Pro 2 ist eine leichte Videobrille für Filme und Spiele unterwegs mit hellem, kontrastreichem Micro-OLED-Bild.

Pros

Sehr helles Bild mit 1600 cd/m², auch neben hellem Fenster nicht ausgewaschen
Nur 63 g, ein knapp dreistündiger Film geht ohne Druck auf der Nase
Dioptrienräder je Auge gleichen Kurzsichtigkeit bis −5 dpt aus

Cons

Ränder und Ecken nur bei passendem Sitz scharf, bei manchen Gesichtern nie
Fixiertes Bild nur per App, Fenster driften und Abstürze kommen vor
Lautsprecher ohne Bass, im Zug zu leise

Best for

Vielreisende, die Filme auf einem großen privaten Bild sehen wollen
Spieler mit Steam Deck, ROG Ally oder USB-C-Handy
Leicht Kurzsichtige bis −5 dpt ohne Hornhautverkrümmung

How we rated it7 criteria

OverallOur rating 74 · GoodValue for money 55 · Okay

How the meta score is made

Our editorial rating50 %
Independent test reports35 %
Ratings from our readers15 %

If a part is missing, its weight is spread across the others. Value for money does not count towards the meta score.

We rate each criterion from 0 to 100. The editorial rating is their weighted average – the higher the weight, the more a criterion counts.

Image quality
Weight 25 %
What we rate
Sharpness in the centre of the image, contrast and black level, colour accuracy, brightness in daylight, reflections and light leaks at the edge of the lenses
This model
76/ 100Good
Image size & edge sharpness
Weight 15 %
What we rate
How large the image appears, whether it stays sharp into the corners and whether you can take it all in without straining your eyes
This model
58/ 100Fair
Wearing comfort
Weight 20 %
What we rate
Weight and its distribution on nose and ears, nose pads and fit on different head shapes, heat during longer use, solution for glasses wearers
This model
72/ 100Good
Compatibility & setup
Weight 15 %
What we rate
Works straight away with smartphone, laptop, console and handheld; required adapters and apps, charging the source device during use, setup without an account
This model
66/ 100Good
Features
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Anchoring the image in space without drift, ultrawide and multiple screens, dimming of the surroundings (even, without stripes), 3D, operation via the buttons on the glasses
This model
58/ 100Fair
Sound
Weight 5 %
What we rate
Volume and sound of the speakers in the temples, how much the people around you can hear, microphone for calls
This model
57/ 100Fair
Build quality
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Material of frame and hinges, cable and strain relief, protective case, warranty
This model
68/ 100Good

How we rate →

No. 10

Rokid Max 2

At a glance

Field of view: 50 degrees
Tracking: 3DoF only with app or accessory
Brightness: 600 cd/m²
Weight: 75 g (2.6 oz)

Our verdictGood73

Die Rokid Max 2 ist eine leichte Videobrille mit 75 g und scharfem, kontrastreichem Micro-OLED-Bild für Filme und Spiele im Sitzen.

Pros

Scharfes, kontrastreiches Micro-OLED-Bild mit 1.920 x 1.080 Pixeln je Auge
Nur 75 g, dreistündiger Flug ohne Beschwerden
Dioptrien-Rädchen gleichen Kurzsichtigkeit bis −6 dpt je Auge getrennt aus

Cons

Mit 600 cd/m² für sonnige Räume und draußen zu dunkel
Bildränder und Buchstabenkanten werden bei Textarbeit weich
Bild im Raum fixieren und Augenabstand nur mit App oder Station 2

Best for

Vielreisende, die in Zug und Flugzeug Filme schauen
Steam-Deck- und ROG-Ally-Spieler, die ein großes Bild wollen
Leicht Kurzsichtige bis −6 dpt ohne Hornhautverkrümmung

How we rated it7 criteria

OverallOur rating 73 · GoodValue for money 51 · Okay

How the meta score is made

Our editorial rating50 %
Independent test reports35 %
Ratings from our readers15 %

If a part is missing, its weight is spread across the others. Value for money does not count towards the meta score.

We rate each criterion from 0 to 100. The editorial rating is their weighted average – the higher the weight, the more a criterion counts.

Image quality
Weight 25 %
What we rate
Sharpness in the centre of the image, contrast and black level, colour accuracy, brightness in daylight, reflections and light leaks at the edge of the lenses
This model
81/ 100Excellent
Image size & edge sharpness
Weight 15 %
What we rate
How large the image appears, whether it stays sharp into the corners and whether you can take it all in without straining your eyes
This model
71/ 100Good
Wearing comfort
Weight 20 %
What we rate
Weight and its distribution on nose and ears, nose pads and fit on different head shapes, heat during longer use, solution for glasses wearers
This model
81/ 100Excellent
Compatibility & setup
Weight 15 %
What we rate
Works straight away with smartphone, laptop, console and handheld; required adapters and apps, charging the source device during use, setup without an account
This model
77/ 100Good
Features
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Anchoring the image in space without drift, ultrawide and multiple screens, dimming of the surroundings (even, without stripes), 3D, operation via the buttons on the glasses
This model
63/ 100Fair
Sound
Weight 5 %
What we rate
Volume and sound of the speakers in the temples, how much the people around you can hear, microphone for calls
This model
71/ 100Good
Build quality
Weight 10 %
What we rate
Material of frame and hinges, cable and strain relief, protective case, warranty
This model
77/ 100Good

How we rate →

Ad · Links marked with * are affiliate links: if you buy through them, we earn a commission – at no extra cost to you.

All models in direct comparison

8 Video Glasses compared head-to-head

Buying advice

Video Glasses buying guide: what to look for

Eine Videobrille zeigt dir über zwei kleine Micro-OLED-Displays einen großen virtuellen Bildschirm vor den Augen – für Filme unterwegs, Gaming am Handheld oder Arbeiten am Laptop ohne zweiten Monitor. Die Hersteller nennen sie auch AR- oder XR-Brille. Wir vergleichen die Modelle nach Bildqualität, Sichtfeld, Tracking, Tragekomfort und der Lösung für Brillenträger; die Bildgröße messen wir am Sichtfeld in Grad, weil jeder Hersteller seine Zoll-Angabe für einen anderen Abstand rechnet. Prüfe vor dem Kauf, ob dein Gerät Bild über USB-C ausgibt: iPhones ab dem iPhone 15, viele Android-Smartphones, Laptops und Handheld-PCs wie das Steam Deck können das, Switch und Spielkonsolen brauchen einen Adapter.

Methodology

How we rate Video Glasses

The meta score (0–100) combines three parts: our editorial rating (50 %), independent test reports (35 %) and ratings from our readers (15 %). If one part is missing, its weight is shared among the others.

The editorial rating draws on manufacturer specifications, independent tests and user experiences. It is made up of 7 criteria with fixed weights:

Image quality25 %

Sharpness in the centre of the image, contrast and black level, colour accuracy, brightness in daylight, reflections and light leaks at the edge of the lenses

Image size & edge sharpness15 %

How large the image appears, whether it stays sharp into the corners and whether you can take it all in without straining your eyes

Wearing comfort20 %

Weight and its distribution on nose and ears, nose pads and fit on different head shapes, heat during longer use, solution for glasses wearers

Compatibility & setup15 %

Works straight away with smartphone, laptop, console and handheld; required adapters and apps, charging the source device during use, setup without an account

Features10 %

Anchoring the image in space without drift, ultrawide and multiple screens, dimming of the surroundings (even, without stripes), 3D, operation via the buttons on the glasses

Sound5 %

Volume and sound of the speakers in the temples, how much the people around you can hear, microphone for calls

Build quality10 %

Material of frame and hinges, cable and strain relief, protective case, warranty

We rate value for money separately: price deliberately does not count towards the meta score. That keeps the score stable when prices change. For value for money, we compare each model with what this category typically offers at its price.

Full methodology