Select and compare
RayNeo GT Max vs. Rokid AR Spatial compared
Video Glasses
At a glance
The key numbers for both devices side by side.
Overall rating
8181Gut
9090Sehr gut
Value for money
62Fair
76Fair
Best price
€579.00
€159.00
Price advantage
—
€420.00 cheaper
Offers
3 shops
2 shops
Rank in category
Rank 5 of 10
Rank 1 of 10
Rating
Sub-ratings compared
RayNeo GT MaxOverall rating 81Rokid AR SpatialOverall rating 90
RayNeo GT MaxRokid AR Spatial
Image quality85/10096/100
Image size & edge sharpness73/10091/100
Wearing comfort86/10085/100
Compatibility & setup77/10085/100
Features79/10093/100
Sound75/10087/100
Build quality81/10093/100
Image quality
85
96
Image size & edge sharpness
73
91
Wearing comfort
86
85
Compatibility & setup
77
85
Features
79
93
Sound
75
87
Build quality
81
93
Specs
Specs compared
Key specs
Model
GT Max
AR Spatial
Field of viewDiagonal field of view (FOV) according to the manufacturer in degrees – the comparable value for image size, unlike the inch figure
59 degrees
50 degrees
TrackingHighest level at which the glasses anchor the image in space: 3DoF follows head rotation, 6DoF also movement through the room; “in the glasses” means with a built-in chip on any source device, without an app
3DoF in the glasses
3DoF only with app or accessory
BrightnessBrightness according to the manufacturer in nits (= cd/m²): the value at the eye (“perceived”), NOT that of the display itself (often 3,000 to 6,000 nits); if the manufacturer gives only one value without qualification, use that
1,200 cd/m²
600 cd/m²
WeightWeight of the glasses according to the manufacturer in grams, without cable, shade and prescription frame
78 g (2.8 oz)
75 g (2.6 oz)
For glasses wearersHow short-sighted users see sharply without their own glasses: insert frame for prescription lenses from an optician or adjustment wheels on the glasses themselves; choose the best available solution
Prescription frame (lenses from an optician)
Built-in diopter adjustment
Image & optics
Display technologyType of image source in the glasses according to the manufacturer (usually Micro-OLED from Sony or BOE)
Micro-OLED
Micro-OLED
Resolution per eyeDisplay resolution for ONE eye according to the manufacturer, not the sum of both eyes; if the manufacturer only delivers the higher resolution via an update, the advertised one
Full HD (1920 × 1080)
WUXGA (1920 × 1200)
Refresh rateHighest refresh rate according to the manufacturer in Hz
120 Hz
120 Hz
HDR formatsHDR formats the glasses themselves display according to the manufacturer – even if this requires a source device from the manufacturer
Dolby Vision
DCI-P3 color gamut coverageCoverage of the DCI-P3 colour space according to the manufacturer in percent; leave empty if only sRGB is given
98 %
3D (side-by-side)According to the manufacturer, the glasses display 3D content in side-by-side format, one image per eye
Yes
Yes
Screen modesDisplay modes the glasses support themselves or with the manufacturer’s app, according to the manufacturer
Anchor image in space2D-to-3D conversion
Ultrawide (32:9)Multiple screensAnchor image in space
Dimming
DimmingHow the surroundings behind the image can be blocked out: clip-on shade or electrically dimming lenses; choose the best available solution
Clip-on shade
Clip-on shade
Dimming levelsNumber of electric dimming levels according to the manufacturer, including “clear”; only for electrochromic lenses
0 levels
Automatic dimmingAccording to the manufacturer, the lenses dim automatically based on ambient light
No
Vision & fit
Correction up toStrongest short-sightedness the built-in adjustment corrects, as an absolute value in diopters: “0 to −6.0 dpt” becomes 6; only with built-in adjustment, none corrects astigmatism
0 dpt
6 dpt
Interpupillary distance adjustmentHow the glasses are adapted to the distance between the pupils: separate versions per size (S/M/L), image shifting via software or movable optics
Fixed sizes per version
Via software
Interpupillary distance (IPD)Suitable interpupillary distance according to the manufacturer in mm, e.g. “57–66 mm” or “under 64 mm” – for sizes S/M/L, enter per version
S: unter 64 mm, M: 64–67 mm, L: über 67 mm
55–72 mm
Connection & features
Video inputHow the image gets into the glasses: USB-C with DisplayPort signal, HDMI only via a manufacturer adapter, or wirelessly
USB-C (DisplayPort)HDMI via adapter
USB-C (DisplayPort)Wireless
Detachable cableAccording to the manufacturer, the cable can be unplugged from the glasses and replaced
Yes
CameraAccording to the manufacturer, a camera is built into the glasses (photos, spatial recognition); a camera available only as an accessory does not count
No
MicrophonesNumber of built-in microphones according to the manufacturer
1 pcs
Speaker tuningAudio partner according to the manufacturer, e.g. “Bang & Olufsen”, “Bose” or “Harman”; empty if none is named
Bang & Olufsen
General
Warranty
1 years
Model year
2026
2025
In the box
Brille, USB-C-Kabel (DP), Etui, 3 Nasenpads, Korrekturglas-Muster, 4 Anti-Rutsch-Bügelpads, Putztuch, Anleitung
Max 2 Brille, Station 2 mit Silikonhülle, Etui, USB-C-Kabel, Aufsteck-Blende, Ersatz-Nasenpads
Prices
Offers
Verdict
Pros & cons
Die RayNeo GT Max ist eine leichte Kinobrille mit 59 Grad Sichtfeld: Das Micro-OLED-Bild ist hell und kontrastreich, das eingebaute 3DoF hält die Leinwand ruhig – an jedem Zuspieler, ohne App. Für Filme unterwegs und Spiele am Handheld taugt sie gut. Der Haken sind weiche Bildränder und grobe Schrift, dazu muss die feste Größe S, M oder L zu deinem Augenabstand passen.
Pros
- 59 Grad Sichtfeld, breiter als bei vielen Brillen dieser Bauform
- Micro-OLED mit tiefem Schwarz, auch bei Tageslicht gut erkennbar
- 3DoF per Chip in der Brille, drei Modi ohne App an jedem Zuspieler
- 78 g, auch nach drei Stunden im Zug kein Druck hinter den Ohren
- Kaum Spiegelungen von unten oder seitlich
- Kabel abnehmbar, Korrekturgläser bis −10 dpt über Optiker möglich
Cons
- Seitliche Bildränder leicht unscharf, Untertitel und Spielanzeigen leiden
- Nur 38 Pixel pro Grad, kleine Schrift wirkt grob
- Im Pinned-Modus sinkt die Helligkeit auf 336 cd/m²
- Augenabstand nicht verstellbar, nur feste Größen S, M, L
- Lautsprecher klingen bei Musik dünn, Umgebung hört mit
Die Rokid AR Spatial verbindet die Videobrille Max 2 mit der Station 2 zu einem Reisekino, das kein Smartphone braucht. Das Micro-OLED-Bild ist scharf und kontrastreich, 75 g sind leicht, und Streaming-Apps laufen direkt über den Play Store. Der Haken: Der Lüfter der Station ist gut hörbar, die Bügel drücken nach einer Weile, und eine deutsche Oberfläche fehlt bisher.
Pros
- Scharfes Micro-OLED-Bild mit 1920 x 1080 Pixeln je Auge und sattem Kontrast
- Station 2 mit Play Store spielt Streaming-Apps ohne Smartphone ab
- Mit 75 g leicht, Ersatz-Nasenpads liegen bei
- Dioptrienrädchen je Auge gleichen Kurzsichtigkeit bis −6 dpt aus
- Bis zu drei Fenster gleichzeitig, Maus und Tastatur per Bluetooth
- Brille läuft auch allein an Laptop oder Handy mit USB-C-Bildausgang
Cons
- Lüfter der Station 2 im ruhigen Zimmer gut hörbar, auch beim Streamen
- Bügel drücken nach längerer Zeit hinter den Ohren
- Keine deutsche Oberfläche, Region nur China, Japan oder USA
- Rokid-App fürs Smartphone stürzt wiederholt ab
- Station bei drei offenen Apps an der Leistungsgrenze, Netflix nicht im Split-Screen
Spotted an error?
Wrong price, wrong spec or a dead link – let us know and we will fix it quickly.
Similar comparisons
RayNeo GT Max81
XREAL 1 Pro+81RayNeo GT Max81
XREAL 1S82RayNeo GT Max81
RayNeo GT78RayNeo GT Max81
VITURE Beast86Keep reading
What’s next?
Maybe a different type of device?
Same kind of training, different devices – one click away.
Build your own comparison